Clark vs Fieldguide
Keep your binder. Skip the year-long project.
Fieldguide positions as an agentic platform that replaces the audit binder, which usually means a long, expensive implementation off your system of record. Clark sits on top of the binder you already use.
How Clark compares
Deployment
- Clark
- Keeps your existing binder
- Fieldguide
- Replaces your binder / system of record
Time to value
- Clark
- Live in days
- Fieldguide
- Often a months-to-year implementation
Switching risk
- Clark
- None, your files stay put
- Fieldguide
- A migration project that can stall
Your methodology
- Clark
- Learned and preserved per firm
- Fieldguide
- Rebuilt inside a new platform
Change the work, not the software.
Clark learns how your firm runs an engagement and does the manual testing and documentation inside your existing binder. Your system of record, your methodology, your review. Just far less of the grind.
Why audit teams choose Clark
No rip and replace
Keep Caseware, Inflo or Engagement Manager and give it superpowers.
Live in days
Not a year-long rollout that ties up your team.
No migration risk
Avoid an expensive project that can fail halfway through.
The proof
- CPA firms, incl. top-10
- 35+
- less manual audit labor
- 80%+
- on a single engagement
- 20h→2h
- raised to build for audit
- $16M
Customers
Trusted by leading firms
See Clark in action
The peer review guarantee, in practice
Watch Ava prepare a workpaper, then trace every figure back to the source document, the change, and the approval.