Clark vs Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager
Keep Engagement Manager. Automate the audit.
Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager is a long-established audit binder and workflow system of record. Clark adds the AI that does the work, on top of it.
How Clark compares
Role
- Clark
- Automates the audit work
- Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager
- Audit binder / system of record
Use together?
- Clark
- Yes, Clark works on top of it
- Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager
- n/a
AI depth
- Clark
- Agentic automation of testing and docs
- Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager
- Traditional binder workflow
Your methodology
- Clark
- Learned and preserved per firm
- Thomson Reuters Engagement Manager
- Your templates and files
Change the work, not the software.
Clark learns how your firm runs an engagement and does the manual testing and documentation inside your existing binder. Your system of record, your methodology, your review. Just far less of the grind.
Why audit teams choose Clark
No migration required
Stay on Engagement Manager and add AI on top.
Modern automation
The work gets done, not just stored.
Preserves your methodology
Clark follows how your firm already works.
The proof
- CPA firms, incl. top-10
- 35+
- less manual audit labor
- 80%+
- on a single engagement
- 20h→2h
- raised to build for audit
- $16M
Customers
Trusted by leading firms
See Clark in action
The peer review guarantee, in practice
Watch Ava prepare a workpaper, then trace every figure back to the source document, the change, and the approval.