Clark vs Trullion
Built for audit, not adapted to it.
Trullion started in lease accounting (ASC 842) for finance teams and moved toward audit over time. Clark was built for the audit department from day one.
How Clark compares
Origin
- Clark
- Built for audit from day one
- Trullion
- Lease accounting / ASC 842
Primary user
- Clark
- Auditors at CPA firms
- Trullion
- Finance and accounting teams
Your methodology
- Clark
- Learned and preserved per firm
- Trullion
- Compliance-driven templates
Fit with your stack
- Clark
- Sits on top of your existing binder
- Trullion
- Separate finance workflow
Change the work, not the software.
Clark learns how your firm runs an engagement and does the manual testing and documentation inside your existing binder. Your system of record, your methodology, your review. Just far less of the grind.
Why audit teams choose Clark
Designed for audit
Not retrofitted from a finance product.
Speaks your language
Built around audit lines and the way engagements actually run.
Preserves your methodology
Clark follows your firm's playbook, not a generic one.
The proof
- CPA firms, incl. top-10
- 35+
- less manual audit labor
- 80%+
- on a single engagement
- 20h→2h
- raised to build for audit
- $16M
Customers
Trusted by leading firms
See Clark in action
The peer review guarantee, in practice
Watch Ava prepare a workpaper, then trace every figure back to the source document, the change, and the approval.